Comments for Bilingual Weekly

Comment on An Interview with California’s Secretary of Natural Resources – John Laird by advance auto battery reviews

advance auto battery reviews — Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:39:51 +0000

Howdy! I just would like to give a huge thumbs up for the great data you’ve got here
on this post. I will be coming again to your blog for extra soon.

Comment on The Tale of Two Tunnels: Gov. Brown’s Tainted BDCP Process Versus Honestly Solving the Problem by Michael McCurley

Michael McCurley — Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:15:03 +0000

Very good article, you summed up over 10 years of researching this subject. The real problem is Stewart Resnick, owner of Paramount Farms, smack in the middle of the Westlands district, the source of the selenium contaminated runoff water that poisoned Kesterson wildlife refuge, at taxpayer expense. Check out Dan Bacher’s many articles on this subject. Mr Resnick spends a lot of money influencing the state capitol. This is the best reason I know of (on the state level) why we need to remove corporate influence from the democratic process. Please keep on with articles on this subject. The old saying is “if you tell a lie loud enough and long enough, it becomes the truth”. We must keep telling the truth loud and long, to contradict the lies being disseminated by OUR state government, at the behest of corporate interests…

Comment on The Tale of Two Tunnels: Gov. Brown’s Tainted BDCP Process Versus Honestly Solving the Problem by Deanna Lynn Wulff

Deanna Lynn Wulff — Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:25:34 +0000

Thanks for your comment, John. I appreciate it, and it gives me a chance to answer. Quite simply, there comes a time that you just have to tell it like it is… and I’ve chosen to do that. Big newspapers usually do this on their editorial page, which is a resource I do not have. I have been patient and fair, listened, researched and read, but after spending enormous amounts of time, energy and personal resources on these stories (even going out of my way to listen to Mike Wade) I’ve reached a conclusion about the BDCP process. It’s not being conducted with the best interests of the people of California in mind. I felt it was time to state that.

Comment on The Tale of Two Tunnels: Gov. Brown’s Tainted BDCP Process Versus Honestly Solving the Problem by John Bass (@deltanatlpark)

John Bass (@deltanatlpark) — Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:57:50 +0000

Not that I mind thoughtful people having them, but is it okay for journalists to express opinions?

Comment on The Tale of Two Tunnels: Gov. Brown’s Tainted BDCP Process Versus Honestly Solving the Problem by CA Farm Water (@farmwater)

CA Farm Water (@farmwater) — Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:32:58 +0000

Elected by the people of California, the Legislature acted in 2009 to establish a reliable water supply through the Delta and to restore the Delta’s ecosystem. The Bay Delta Conservation Plan proposes to accomplish those two goals by implementing an improved conveyance system that considers optilons including one with twin tunnels and also to restore 140,000 acres of habitat in the region. Scientists and researchers have worked for seven years to develop the proposal offered through BDCP. The first four chapters of the plan are available at http://baydeltaconservationplan.com/BDCPPlanningProcess/KeyAnnouncements.aspx and the remaining chapters are scheduled for release.

Mike Wade
California Farm Water Coalition

Comment on The Tale of Two Tunnels: Gov. Brown’s Tainted BDCP Process Versus Honestly Solving the Problem by Corey Cate

Corey Cate — Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:34:37 +0000

the process wholly shows that the corruption of “Interested Parties” drives it. Greed. Entitlement of the very wealthy. Thank you for your clarity.

Comment on Water Conservation, Recycling and California’s Future by http://www.pipesnake.net

http://www.pipesnake.net — Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:29:28 +0000

This piece of writing presents clear idea in
support of the new visitors of blogging,
that really how to do blogging.

Comment on The BDCP Meeting(s) Get Heated: A Benefits Analysis, Angry Environmental Groups, 57 Threatened Species & 100,000 Acre-Feet by Deanna Lynn Wulff

Deanna Lynn Wulff — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:42:54 +0000

Thanks for your comment!

Comment on The BDCP Meeting(s) Get Heated: A Benefits Analysis, Angry Environmental Groups, 57 Threatened Species & 100,000 Acre-Feet by Deanna Lynn Wulff

Deanna Lynn Wulff — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:25:28 +0000

Thank you for your thoughtful comment, Chris!

Comment on The BDCP Meeting(s) Get Heated: A Benefits Analysis, Angry Environmental Groups, 57 Threatened Species & 100,000 Acre-Feet by Salmon Water Now! (@SalmonWaterNow)

Salmon Water Now! (@SalmonWaterNow) — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:24:26 +0000

It’s long past time to scrap the BDCP process – it’s plainly not serving the interests of the people, just the well-connected water barons south of the Delta. It’s time to divert LESS freshwater south of the Delta and STOP unfairly favoring taxpayer subsidized, junior water right holding, toxin-leaching land-owning, poverty-wage paying corporate agribusinesses over family farms and fishermen elsewhere in the state. Let’s support Delta farmers and salmon by taking a common sense approach to the biggest problems and prioritize Delta levee repair and retiring irrigated farmlands in Westlands Water DIstrict that send toxic selenium into the Delta.